Retrospective clinical trial of contraceptive
effectiveness of the electronic fertility indicator Lady-Comp/Baby-Comp
G. FREUNDL (1)
P. FRANK-HERRMANN (1)
E. GODEHARDT (3)
R. KLEMM (3)
M. BACHHOFER (2)
(1) Frauenklinik Staedt. Krankenhaus Diisseldorf-Benrath,
Teaching Hospital of the H. H. University of Dusseldorf
(2) Seestrasse 22, D-82449 Uffing, Germany;
(3) Biometrical Unit of the Surgical Department, H. H. University
of Dusseldorf, Germany
Abstract
The Baby-Comp/Lady-Comp (Valley Electronics Ltd., Eschenlohe,
Germany) is an electronic device that combines the temperature
method and calendar method for planning and preventing pregnancy
by identifying the fertile and infer-tile phases of the menstrual
cycle.
In a retrospective clinical trial, the system
was tested as a contraceptive aid. A total of 648 women from
Germany and Switzerland have participated: 597 women with
10 275 months of use used the device for contraception. Thirty-three
unplanned pregnancies were identified, giving a total pregnancy
rate of 3.8 use effectiveness according to the Pearl Index.
Six method-related pregnancies occurred, producing a method
Pearl Index of 0.7. Calculating the cumulative pregnancy rates
by life-table analysis, it was found that, after about one
year of exposure, the probability of an unintended pregnancy
was 5.3% (0.053), after 2 years it was 6.8% (0.068) and after
about 3 years of exposure it was 8.2% (0.082). The mean length
of the identified fertile period was 14.3 days with a standard
deviation of 4.6 days in all cycles reported. The acceptance
of the device by the woman and her partner was good. In fact,
21 of the 33 women who became pregnant would still recommend
the device for further use (63.6%).
Introduction
Today it is possible to avoid pregnancy effectively with natural
family planning, i.e. with the so-called symptothermal method.
However, for some women self-observation of their body to
detect the fertile phase is inconvenient and therefore makes
NFP methods unacceptable [1-3]. This is why, over the past
decade, specific devices and tests have been developed to
detect ovulation and the fertile phase [4-7]. Some of these
technologies use a combination of basal body temperature (BBT)
measurement and calendar calculation to identify the fertile
and infertile phases in the menstrual cycle. The names of
these temperature computers are Bioself, Lady-Comp/Baby-Comp
and Cyclotest.
This paper deals with the temperature computer
Baby-Comp/Lady-Comp (BC/LC). Some efficacy-finding studies (EFS)
with this computer have been published [8,91. Until the present
time, no study has been reported dealing with the contraceptive
effectiveness of the device. We report on a retrospective
non-comparative effectiveness study (rES) which gives some
idea of the value of this device in preventing unwanted pregnancy
[see also Reference 10].
In addition to examining the effectiveness,
questions concerning the length of the fertile phase detected
by the computer, and the possible influence of the body-mass
index of the user on the fertile phase in a cycle have been
investigated. The temperature computers, which store the cycle
data electronically, make it easy to answer various questions
concerning the menstrual cycle and to statistically evaluate
these data from several gynecological aspects.
Materials
BC/LC is developed and manufactured by Valley Electronics
and is sold in pharmacies throughout Germany, Switzerland
and Austria. It is a portable electronic device that measures
BBT orally in 30-60 s, and checks and stores the temperature
values, as well as the length and other information about
the woman's menstrual cycle in a large data base. A microprocessor
uses an evaluation program to identify the change in BBT following
ovulation in order to indicate the user's daily fertility
status by means of colored lights: a green light indicates
'infertile', a red light indicates 'fertile' and a yellow
light indicates 'unsure'. The actual fertility status and
the daily temperature are shown on the display. Inaccurate
temperature readings are indicated on the display and with
an acoustic signal. All data are stored and evaluated for
4 months and some specific cycle data are stored for 5 years.
If there is no free memory, the oldest data are removed from
the memory of the device and new data are entered. Using a
special interface, the data of the device can also be shown
on a PC screen.
Baby-Comp (BC) differs from Lady-Comp (LC) in
that it includes the option of entering the date of intercourse,
as well as incorporating an additional program level which
shows the optimal conception time and the probable sex of
the offspring following intercourse on a particular day of
the cycle relative to ovulation. The expected day of delivery
is calculated from the ovulation day and is shown on the screen
of the device.
Methodology
After tracing the addresses of purchasers of BC/LC over the
past 3 years, we sent questionnaires (Appendix 1) to 800 German
purchasers. One hundred and eighty-two letters came back unopened
as the addressees had moved and the new addresses were not
known. Sixteen customers had bought devices but had not used
them. Consequently, 602 were able to answer the questionnaire.
Of these, 538 returned the questionnaires, a response rate
of 89.7%. In the same way, 110 questionnaires were returned
to us from Switzerland. Thus, for the statistical analysis,
a total of 538+110 = 648 questionnaires were included in the
study.
The most important question referred to the
occurrence of pregnancy while using the device. When we heard
about a pregnancy, we examined the type of pregnancy according
to the opinion of the user: Did it occur during the use of
the device? Did the BC/LC show a green, red or yellow light?
When had intercourse taken place? The cut-off date for the
study was August 31, 1995.
The size and the weight of the participant were
recorded on the questionnaire, so we were able to determine
the body-mass index of the user, which is defined by BMI =
body weight/height x height [kg/m^2].
Some socioeconomic characteristics of the volunteers
were computed from the questionnaires (Table 1). Table 2 shows
contraceptive usage prior to the use of the device. BC/LC
was used according to the manufacturer's instructions without
any special training.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics
of the participating women
Age:
| <19 |
2 |
0.3 |
| 19-29 |
441 |
68.6 |
| 30-39 |
183 |
28.5 |
| 40-45 |
15 |
2.3 |
| >45 |
2 |
0.3 |
Table 2. Prior contraceptive usage (one answer
- main method)
Number of children:
| None |
384 |
59.3 |
| 1 |
138 |
21.3 |
| 2 |
87 |
13.4 |
| 3 |
30 |
4.6 |
| 4 |
9 |
1.4 |
Method
% of use
Pill 86.5%
Condom 5.7%
Diaphragm 0.2%
Natural method 3.7%
IUD 1.7%
Others 2.2%
Pregnancy classification
a) Method-related unplanned pregnancy: the pregnancy was the
result of an unprotected intercourse on a 'green day' shown
by the computer.
b) User-related unplanned pregnancy: the pregnancy
was the result of intercourse on a 'red' or 'yellow' day
c) Unsure: the available information did not
enable us to classify the unplanned pregnancy into (a) or
(b).
Statistical analysis
Contraceptive efficacy was assessed in terms of pregnancy
rates in two ways:
a) We used the Pearl Index [I I] which gives
the number of pregnancies that would occur per 100 woman years
of being exposed to the risk of pregnancy. The Pearl Index
is computed as the number of pregnancies divided by the number
of cycles multiplied by 1200 (or 1300 if data are collected
by cycles).
b) As the Pearl Index is flawed because it suffers
from duration bias (in general, the longer a study runs, the
more effective a method will appear), we also calculated the
pregnancy rate applying methods commonly used for the analysis
of survival times. The cumulative pregnancy rates for different
groups of subjects were calculated by the life-table or (in
this case equivalently) the Kaplan-Meier method [121 and the
proportions of subjects pregnant within one, two or the first
three years.
Results
Participants
Questionnaires from 648 women were available from Germany
and Switzerland. These can be divided into 493 German women
with 8284 months of use and 104 Swiss women with 1991 months
of use who used the devices for contraception. The remaining
51 women used the system in order to achieve pregnancy. Some
socioeconomic characteristics are shown in Table I and prior
contraceptive usage is incorporated into Table 2, respectively.
Contraceptive efficacy
Pearl pregnancy rate
When the BC/LC was used for contraception, 33 unplanned pregnancies
were identified in 10 275 months of use. Therefore the total
pregnancy rate or use effectiveness is 33 x 1200/ 10 275,
which gives a Pearl Index [11] of 3.8.
Counting only the pregnancies which occurred
as a result of intercourse when the computer showed a green
light, we found 6 pregnancies, giving a method pregnancy rate
of 0.7 according to the Pearl Index.
Life table probability of the risk of pregnancy
Table 3 shows the actuarial curve according to Kaplan-Meier
[12].
Column 2 shows the number of women exposed,
and column 3 the number of unintended pregnancies reported.
From this table, it can be seen that, after one year of exposure,
the cumulative probability of an unintended pregnancy is 5.3%
(0.053), after 2 years of exposure it is 6.8% (0.068), and
after 3 years 8.3% (0.083).
Table 3. Rate of unplanned pregnancies (actuarial
curve, Kaplan-Meier)
| Ordinal cycle
number |
|
|
|
|
| Women exposed |
Pregnancies (cumulative) |
|
|
|
| Unplanned |
Cumulative months of
use |
Cumulative pregnancy
rate (%) |
|
|
| 1 |
524 |
2 |
524 |
0.57 |
| 3 |
514 |
6 |
1552 |
1.34 |
| 6 |
485 |
14 |
3511 |
2.90 |
| 12 |
288 |
23 |
5274 |
5.29 |
| 18 |
183 |
26 |
6759 |
6.78 |
| 24 |
106 |
26 |
7297 |
6.78 |
| 36 |
38 |
27 |
8051 |
8.26 |
Length of the fertile phase
The last cycle of the users showed a mean length of fertile
period of 16.3 days with a standard deviation of 4.6 days.
A single yellow day at the beginning and the end of the fertile
phase is included in this figure. However, often, three or
more days of a cycle were yellow. In our opinion, it is a
problem that the pregnancy risk of the yellow days is not
explained to the user. The fertile phase would be longer if
all yellow days were included. In the user's instructions,
it is written that, in up to 20% of cycles, there is yellow
from the end of the red phase up to the end of the cycle.
With the exception of anovulatory cycles (about 3% of the
women concerned), these are probably cycles where the postovulatory
phase is not detected and the yellow days are potentially
fertile.
The distribution of the length of the red phase
relative to cycle length is shown in Table 4. With normal
cycles of 26-30 days' duration the mean length of the fertile
phase was 13.5. Figure I underlines these relationships and
Figure 2 shows the distribution of the length of the red phase
of all participants in the last cycle reported.
Table 4. Cycle length and mean length of
the fertile phase (red phase)
| Cycle length (days) |
Mean length of fertile phase
(days) |
SD (days) |
| =< 20 |
9.9 |
Only one value |
| 21-25 |
12.4 |
0.76 |
| 26-30 |
13.5 |
0.87 |
| 31-35 |
16.4 |
1.61 |
| 36-40 |
17.5 |
3.2 |
| => 41 |
27.4 |
7.67 |
Length of cycle(days)
Figure 1. Correlation of the fertile phase to the length of
cycle Effectiveness of the Electronic Fertility Indicator
Lady-Comp/Baby-Comp Indicator Lady-Comp/Baby-Comp
Number of red days
Figure 2. Length of the red phase in the last
cycles of use in all participants
Assessment of the device by the user
It was interesting that 90% of the questioned users would
recommend the device to their friends or other interested
people. They were happy that they had found an effective method
without side effects. Surprisingly, 21 of the 33 women who
became unintentionally pregnant while using the temperature
computer would still recommend the device for future use (63.6%).
As with other behavioral methods, the partner's
reaction is key. Therefore, we also asked for an assessment
of the device by the partner. It is interesting that, at the
start, 70.9% of the partners were in favor of the device compared
with 79.0% after use. At the beginning, 4.9% of partners were
against using the device compared with 5.0% at the end.
Risk of pregnancy and body-mass index
As we had information about the weight and the height of the
users we were able to determine the BMI. The number of ovarian
function disturbances increases if a woman exceeds a normal
BMI (19-24).
We found that 71 women hoping to prevent a pregnancy
had a BMI>24, providing a total of 1161 cycles. With 6
pregnancies, the PI amounts to 6.2. Among 548 women with normal
BMI, we found a PI of 3.3 in 8839 preventing cycles. The difference
is statistically significant (Student's t-test).
Appendix 1:
The contraceptive effectiveness of a device is a function
of accuracy of the indicators and the rules which form the
algorithm of the device and of the behavior of the user. The
system we have used (BC/LC) has already been demonstrated
to locate the fertile time in a woman's cycle rather accurately
in efficacy-findings studies (EFS) [8,9]. However, its usefulness
as a contraceptive device or as a system aimed at helping
women to get pregnant has never been tested.
This is a retrospective study with all the disadvantages
entailed in such studies. However, we believe that it is possible
to give an idea of the effectiveness of the system, as experienced
in daily use. Under these circumstances we found that the
system displayed a total effectiveness of 3.8 (Pl) and a method
effectiveness of 0.7 Pl.
These results cannot be compared with the results
of prospective studies of original methods of natural family
planning (NFP). Prospective studies (pES) of the symptothermal
method of NFP showed a user effectiveness of 2.8 PI in Germany,
and a method effectiveness of 0.3 with 758 women and 14 870
cycles [13]. We are sure that the motivation of a NFP user
is different from that of a user of a new technology (NT)
like the temperature computer. NT users may not pay as much
attention to abstinence or may not adjust it so carefully
to the stage of the cycle. Therefore, we think that the use
effectiveness of 3.1 PI is overestimated because of the retrospective
character of the study.
Compared with hormonal computers, NT uses well
established parameters, such as temperature. Another temperature
computer, Bioself I 10, was studied prospectively [14-161:
131 women contributed 1238 cycles. One pregnancy occurred
on a green day, one pregnancy occurred on a day which the
woman thought was a green day. Eleven pregnancies occurred
due to barrier method failure and another I I when the volunteers
knowingly had unprotected intercourse during the red phase.
There were five planned pregnancies in this study. Calculating
the pregnancy rates in the usual way, the total pregnancy
rate was 23.3 PI, whereas the method pregnancy rate was 1.9
PI. Discounting barrier method failures, we still have a total
pregnancy rate of 12.6 PI. However, the results cannot be
compared as the type of study (retrospective/prospective)
varies. For the new generation of Bioself 2000 and Cyclotest
2 plus, the only available results are from efficacy-finding
studies [9,17].
With the personal system of hormonal monitoring,
Persona, two parameters are used to determine the fertile
time in a cycle: estriol glucuronide (E3G) and luteinizing
hormone (LH) in urine. A multicenter prospective efficacy
trial was carried out using this system to determine the method
effectiveness of personal hormone monitoring in preventing
pregnancy used in conjunction with abstinence from sexual
intercourse during the identified fertile period. The trial
was carried out in Germany, the UK and Ireland. The German
results have already been published [ 18]. The calculated
method pregnancy rate was 6.2%, resulting in an effectiveness
for Persona, when used with abstinence on red days, of 94%.
However, when comparing these with the figures for temperature
computers, it must be pointed out that a prospective study
is being compared with a retrospective study.
With all methods of periodic abstinence [ 1,
13,19], the couple's motivation to abstain from intercourse
is essential for the success of the method. In the present
study about two-thirds of the women had no problems obeying
the rules, one-third declared that they had some problems.
Interestingly, these figures were related to the age of the
participants: 6.6% (14 out of 213) of the 21-25 year age group
admitted to having problems; the figure concerning problems
with abstinence rose to 14.5% (18 out of 124) in the 31-35
year age group; over 35 years, the figure was only 2.3% (1
out of 42). These figures correspond well with known figures
for NFP users. We know that, in the course of time, the problems
decrease, but do not disappear [20].
Obviously many people were satisfied with this
technology: more than 90% of the participants would recommend
it to their friends: 21 out of 33 with an unplanned pregnancy
would still do so.
We conclude that the present technology of BC/LC
can produce reasonable results in users who like this kind
of technology. Compared with the symptothermal method or with
the hormonal monitoring system, the length of the fertile
time is increased. We do not think that clients using original
NFP methods are the same as those using new technologies [2,3,19].
However, they both belong to the group of women who do not
want to interfere with their bodies by supplying hormones
or introducing mechanical or chemical substances.
In the present age, we must be aware that this
kind of contraception does not protect against venereal diseases
like STD or HIV. This means that it is most suitable for couples
in stable relationships.
References
1. Diaz M. Gender, sexuality and communication issues
that constitute barriers to the use of natural family planning
and other fertility awareness-based methods. . Adv Contracept.
1997; 13: 303-9.
2. Freundl G. Rhythm and devices. Eur
J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1996; 1:80.
3. Freundl G, Frank-Herrmann P, Raith-Paula
E. Naturliche Familienplanung. Gyndkologe. 1998;31:398-409..
4. Flynn AM. Natural family planning
and the new technologies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989; 1: 123-7.
5. Freundl G, Bremme M, Frank-Herrmann
P, Baur S, Godehardt E, Sottong U. The CUE fertility monitor
compared to ultrasound and LH peak measurements for fertile
time ovulation detection. Adv Contracept. 1996;12:111-21.
6. Martinez AR, Zinaman MJ, Jennings
VH, Lamprecht VM. Prediction and detection of the fertile
period: the markers. Int J Fertil. 1995;40(3):139-55.
7. World Health Organisation. Temporal
relationship between indices of the fertile period. Fertil
Steril. 1983;39:647-55.
8. Freundl G, Baur S, Bremme M, Doring
GK, Frank-Herrmann P. Lady-Comp as an aid in natural family
planning. Adv Contracept. 1992;8:184.
9. Freundl G, Baur S, Bremme M et al.
Temperaturcomputer zur Bestimmung der fertilen Zeit im Zyklus
der Frau: Baby-Comp, Bioself 110, Cyclotest D. Fertilitat.
1992;8:66-76.
10. Lamprecht V, Trussell J. Natural
family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports.
Adv Contracept. 1997;13:155-65.
11. Pearl R. Factors in human fertility
and their statistical evaluation. Lancet, 1933;2:607-11.
12. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric
estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-81.
13. Frank-Herrmann P, Freund] G, Gnoth
Ch et al. Natural family planning with and without barrier
method use in the fertile phase: efficacy in relation to sexual
behaviour - a German prospective study. Adv Contracept. 1997;
13:179-89
14. Drouin J, Guilbert EE, Desaulniers
G. An evaluation of the Bioself I 10 electronic fertility
Contrace indicator as a contraceptive aid. Contraception.
1994;50(3):229-38.
15. Flynn A, Pulcrano J, Royston P, Spieler
J. An evaluation of the Bioself 110 electronic fertility indicator
as a contraceptive aid. Contraception. 1991;44(2):125-39.
16. Ismail M, Arshat H, -Pulcrano J,
Royston P, Spieler J. An evaluation of the BIOSELF 110 fertility
indicator. Contraception. 1989;39(l):53-71.
17. Bremme M, Freundl G, Frank-Herrmann
P. Analysis of the computer-thermometer "Cyclotest D"
to be used for natural family planning. Adv Contracept. 1992;
8:22 1.
18. Freundl G, Bonnar J, Flynn AM, Frank-Herrmann
P, Kirkman R, Snowden R. Effektivitat eines neuen Verhutungscomputers
"PERSONA" - Bericht uber Testergebnisse in Deutschland.
Fortschr Med. 1998; 116 Originalien 1:25-30
19. Raith E, Frank P, Freund] G. Naturliche
Familienplanung heute: New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer;
1994:1-243.
20. Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P, Freund]
G, Kunert J, Godehardt E. Sexual behavior of natural family
planning users in Germany and its changes over time. Adv Contracept.
1995; 11: 173-85
MS received I June 98.
Accepted for publication 10 June 98.
Resume
Le Baby-Comp/Lady-CompTM (Valley Electronics Ltd., Eschenlohe,
Allemagne) est un dispositif eIectronique qui associe la methode
des temperatures et la methode du calendrier pour planifier
et eviter des grossesses en cernant les phases fertiles et
infertiles du cycle menstruel.
Ce systeme a ete teste comme moyen contraceptif
lors d'une etude clinique r6trospective. Y ont participipe
648 femmes en Allemagne et en Suisse. 597 femmes, representant
10 275 mois d'utilisation, ont eu recours A ce dispositif
A des fins contraceptives. 33 grossesses non planifiees ont
ete recensees, soit un pourcentage total de grossesses de
3,8 li6 a une utilisation effective selon l'indice de Pearl.
Six grossesses li&s d la m&thode se sont produites,
soit un indice de 0,7 de la m6thode Pearl. En calculant les
taux cumul&s de grossesses par une analyse des tables
de survie, on a constat~ que ]a probabilit6 d'une grossesse
non intentionnelle kait de 5,3% (0,053) apr6s environ un an
d'application, de 6,8% (0,068) apr6s 2 ans et de 8,2% (0,082)
apr&s environ 3 ans. La dur6e moyenne de la p6riode fertile
identifi6e 6tait de 14,3 jours, avec, un ~cart-type de 4,6
jours, pour tous les cycles consid&r&s. Ce dispositif
&ait bien accept6 par les fernmes et par les partenaires.
En fait, 21 des 33 fernmes chez qui une grossesse s'est d&clar&e
continueraient i recommander Futilisation de cette m6thode
(63,6%).
Resumen
El Baby-Comp/Lady-Comp (Valley Electronics Ltd., Eschenlohe,
Alemania) es un dispositivo clectr6nico que combina el m6todo
de ]a temperatura y el m&todo del calendario para planificar
y prevenir el embarazo, identificando la fase fecunda e infecunda
del ciclo menstrual.
En un ensayo clinico retrospectivo, el sistema
fue sometido a prueba como medio anticonceptivo, con la participaci6n
de 648 mujeres de Alemania y Suiza., Este dispositivo fue
utilizado a efectos anticonceptivos por 597 mujeres con 10
275 meses de uso. Se identificaron 33 embarazos no planificados,
cifra que da una tasa total de embarazo de eficacia de uso
de 3,8 se&n el indice de Pearl. Hubo seis embarazos relacionados
con el m6todo, cifra que da un indice de Pearl del m6todo
de 0,7. Calculando las tasas acumulativas de embarazo mediante
el andlisis con tablas de vida, se descubri6 que, al cabo
de aproximadamente un afio de exposici6n, la probabilidad
de un embarazo no intencional era 5,3% (0,053), al cabo de
2 afios, 6,8% (0,068) y al cabo de 3 afios de exposici6n,
8,2% 0,082), respectivamente. La longitud media del periodo
fecundo identificado era 14,3 dias, con una desviaci6n estdndar
de 4,6 dias en todos los ciclos notificados. La aceptaci6n
del dispositivo por parte de la mujer y de su compahero era
buena. En efecto, 21 de las 33 mujeres que quedaron embarazadas
continuarian recomendando el dispositivo para seguir utilizindolo
(63,6%).
|