European Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 47 (1992) 121-127 992
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights reserved 0028-
2243/92/$05.00
The reliability, acceptability and applications
of basal body temperature (BBT) records in the diagnosis and
treatment of infertility
Antonio R. Martinez, Marcel H.A van Hooff, Erik
Schoute, Maartje van der Meer,
Frank J.M. Broekmans and Peter G.A. Hompes
Division of Reproduclire Endocrinology and Fertility,
Department of Obsterics and Gynecology, Free University Hospital,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Accepted for publication 13 August 1992
Summary
The possibilities and limitations of basal body temperature
(BBT) records as an adjunct in the management of infertility
were re-evaluated. To assess its accuracy as an index of ovulation,
172 charts were analyzed by three different physicians. While
the average true positive rate was 90%, the false negative
rate was only 2%. The remaining graphs (8%) were classified
as non-interpretable, probably reflecting measurement problems.
Retrospective assessment of 210 biphasic records showed the
thermal nadir to occur within I day of the urinary luteinizing
hormone (LH) surge in 75% of the cases, and in 90% when 2
days where considered. This confirms BBT as a relatively accurate
guide for retrospective identification of the pericivulatory
period. Moreover, results of a study conducted to investigate
how patients experienced daily recording of BBT graphs suggest
that the method is well accepted by a high proportion of women.
From all these it appears that there are many indications
where BBT graphs can still be applied. Development. of new
electronic devices may further improve the reliability, acceptability
and applications of the BBT records in the fertility investigation.
Basal body temperature; LH test; Infertility;
Ovulation
Introduction
The observation that the basal body temperature (BBT) has
a biphasic pattern during the menstrual cycle was first reported
by William S.
Correspondence to. Marcel H.A. van Hooff, M.D.,
Division Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility, Department
Obsterics and Gynecology, Free University Hospital, P.O. Box
7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Squire in 1868 in the transactions of the London
Obstetrical Society [1]. Mary Putnam Jacobi, one of the first
American woman physicians, also noticed the biphasic curve
of the basal temperature in women (21, but they both failed
to connect this finding to ovulation. A possible relationship
between the timing of evulation and the shift in the BBT was
first suggested in 1904 by the Dutch gynecologist Theodoor
Hendrik van de Velde [3] Later in 1926, he clarified that
the corpus luteum was responsible for higher temperatures
in the second half of the cycle and that the end of corpus
luteum activity caused menstruation. He also clearly stated
that the temperature shift was related to ovulation [4). Since
that time there has been good evidence for the clinical use
of the BBT graph [5-8] and it has been widely applied as a
simple, inexpensive method to determine whether ovulation
has occurred and to estimate its timing in the menstrual cycle.
However, often more has been expected from the BBT graph,
both in concurrent and retrospective interpretation, than
it can actually provide. As a consequence, its value has been
questioned and unccrtainty has emerged with regard to the
concrete possibilities and applications of the BBT chart.
Moreover, the recent development of new methods and techniques
allowing a more accurate prediction and detection of ovulation,
has raised questions on the current place of the BBT record
in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility problems.
The present study is intended to re-assess the
reliability of the method as well as its possibilities and
limitations in fertility investigation. In addition, the acceptability
by the patients and their personal experience with the performance
of BBT charts were evaluated. The applicability of the method
and the potential role that novel computerized measuring devices
may play in this area is further discussed.
Reliability of BBT records
Detection of ovulation
Basically, a BBT record provides information on the existence
of either a biphasic or a monophasic pattern. A biphasic BBT
graph is assumed to be indicative of ovulation and reflects
the central effect of increasing plasma progesterone levels
secreted by a functional corpus luteurn [7]. However, ovulation
has been reported to occur in 3% to 20% of monophasic BBTs
when based on hormonal or sonographic criteria 18-121. Another
study [13] found that when using the occurrence of pregnancy
as ovulation criteria, all charts studied (n = 110) showed
a biphasic BBT pattern. On the other hand, the chance that
biphasic BBTs could be observed during anovulatory cycles
is almost nihil [8,121. These data suggest that the method
has in fact a high specificity, defined as the ability to
identify the true-negatives, whereas the sensitivity, the
ability to identify true-positives, has been found variable
according to the different studies.
The accuracy in identification of a BBT pattern
is mainly affected by factors related to the method itself,
and by the interpretation of the observer. Factors related
to the method include either improper recording, illness,
diet, medication and sleeping pattern alterations, or inability
of an adequate level of progesterone to exert its thermogenic
effect. Correct interpretation of a record has been commonly
associated to the knowledge and experience of the observer.
Most of the published studies evaluating the
reliability of BBT graphs as a method of ovulation detection
have expressed their results in terms of monophasic or biphasic
patterns. However, such a differentiation is in fact not always
very clear, particularly when based on subjective criteria
141.
To investigate to which extent the occurrence
of poorly defined or erratic patterns could affect the accuracy
of BBT readings as an index of ovulation, 172 charts from
54 normally cycling women (mean 3.2, SD ± 1.7, range
1-6 charts per woman) were independently analyzed by three
different physicians. They were unaware of the patients medical
history and were asked to quailify the records as either biphasic,
monophasic or non-interpretable, according to their own interpretation
criteria. One hundred and twelve of the cycle's (65%) were
spontaneous, whereas 60 cycles (35%) were stimulated with
100 mg clomiphene citrate (CC) (Serophene, Scrono, Geneva,
Switzerland) daily from days 3 to 8 of the cycle. All cycles
were ovulatory as confirmed by daily vaginal ultrasound monitoring
[15]. The three physicians participating in the study worked
in our Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility
and had different grades of experience with the interpretation
of BBT charts. Observer A was a recently initiated fellow,
observer B was an experienced gynecologist, and observer C
was an advanced resident in obstetrics and gynecology.
Observers
* Biphasic * Non-interp. * Monophasic
Fig. 1. Percentage of BBT graphs (n - 172) qualified as biphasic,
non-interpretable or monophasic by three different ob- servers.
The obtained results are shown in Fig. 1. The
number of records identified as biphasic were 170 (98.8%)
for observer A, 157 (91.3%) for observer B, and 140 (81.4%)
for observer C, giving an average true positive rate of 90.5%.
There were 2 charts marked as monophasic by observer B, and
5 by observer C, which represents a false negative rate of
1.3% and 2.9%, respectively. The remaining 2 (1.3%), 13 (7.5%)
and 27 (15.7%) charts were qualified as non interpretable
by the respective observers. There were no substantial differences
observed in the interpretation of records from either spontaneous
or CC stimulated cycles.
The rate of true-positive findings observed
in this study coincides with data in the literature [8,10,12]
and reconfirms the discrepancy between investigators concerning
the interpretation of BBT charts. However, in this study such
discrepancies were found to be mainly based on the number
of charts considered as non-interpretable. The observation
of these irregular patterns, which may probably reflect methodologic
and/or technical problems rather than the occurrence of definite
monophasic records, seems to be the major cause of erroneous
interpretations and could explain the discrepancies between
studies. The strength of the criteria used to define a biphasic
pattern appeared to be associated with the experience of the
observer. The low percentage (2%) of clear false-negative
patterns found in this study contributes to validate the accuracy
of BBT graphs as an index of ovulation. Moreover, these findings
suggest that the incidence of noninterpretable records could
be substantially reduced not only by improving aspects related
to the interpretation criteria but following a refinement
of the measurement techniqe [14].
Ovulation prediction
Fig. 2. Time relationship between the day of urinary LH surge
detection (day 0) and the day of the BBT nadir in sponta-
neous (n = 94) and clormiphene citrale (n = 116) stimulated
cycles.
The anticipation of ovulation using a concurrent
BBT graph has long been used as an aid to conception and for
timing of insemination. The two most common suggestions for
the BBT graph as a concurrent method of predicting ovulation
are a dip (nadir) in the curve, that signals the approach
of ovulation, and a subsequent sharp rise between two successive
days indicating ovulation. Although it is now well accepted
that the BBT graph is an unreliable marker for the prediction
of ovulation [16], it still could be useful as a simple method
for retrospective identification of the presumptive day of
ovulation.
Among the numerous parameters used to detect
the day of ovulation, the identification of the luteinizing
hormone (LH) surge appears to be the most reliable indicator
of impending ovulation [171. The relationship between the
thermal nadir and the LH surge have been stressed by different
studies in the past [18-201. In order to asses the accuracy
of BBTs in retrospectively predicting the day of the Urinary
LH surge, we analyzed 210 records of 88 patients (mean 1.8,
SD ± 0.7, range 1-4 cycles per patient) who underwent
intrauterine insemination with their husbands' semen. Ninety-four
(45%) cycles were spontaneous and 116 cycles (55%) were stimulated
with 100 mg CC (Serophene, Serono) daily from days 3 to 8
of the cycle. Monitoring of an LH surge was performed in morning
and evening urine samples by means of the LH Color' test (Organon,
Oss, The Netherlands), which detects the LH peak on average
16 to 28 hours before ovulation. The characteristics of the
test as well as its clinical Teliability for the prediction
of the time of ovulation have been previously reported [21].
All cycles included in the study had presented a positive
test, presumably reflecting the occurrence of a urinary LH
surge above 50 U/l, and were ovulatory as confirmed by daily
vaginal ultrasound [15). A reproductive endocrinologist, experienced
in the reading of BBTs and having no prior knowledge of patients'
results, was asked to review the charts and to predict retrospectively
the day of the LB surge by determining the thermal nadir (subjective
interpretation). The day of urinary LH Surge detection was
considered as day 0, and the number of cycles where the nadir
differed around the LH surge were expressed as cumulative
percentages for each subsequent day.
The results obtained from this study are shown
in Fig. 2. There were no differences in the relationship of
thermal nadir to urinary LH surge between spontaneous and
CC stimulated cycles. From all cycles, in 66 cases (31.5%)
the LH surge occurred on the day of the nadir, in 157 cases
(74.8%) when ± I day was considered, and in 193 cases
(91.8%) the nadir was found within ±2 days of the LH
surge. For the remaining cases the surge fell more than 2
days from the nadir.
These findings closely coincide with other published
studies relating the BBT nadir to the day of the LH surge
[18-201 and reconfirms the inaccuracy of BBT records for the
prediction of ovulation. However, when retrospectively analyzed,
in 75% of the cases the thermal nadir was noted within I day
of the LB surge and in more than 90% of the cases when 2 days
where considered. This indicates that BBT charts still can
provide a reasonably accurate guide for retrospective assessment
of events related to the periovulatory period.
Acceptability
Despite the extensive use of BBT graphs in clinical practice,
and the active participation it demands from the patients,
not much attention has been payed to the customers concern
with the method in most of the reported studies. The following
study was conducted to investigate how women experienced daily
recording of HBT graphs and the factors which could affect
their qualification of the procedure.
The first 100 patients who, from the start of
the study, attended our Division of Reproductive Endocrinology
and Fertility, were given a standard questionaire. The answers
were returned anonimously and always on a voluntary basis.
The first questions were related to demographic data, education,
kind of work and reason of consult. Patients were asked for
the number of cycles they had kept a BBT chart (=< 3,4-6,
=> 7) and whether it was related to: (a) the fertility
investigation, (b) monitoring of a treatment or, (c) voluntary
use as a method of self-observation. To qualify the burden
associated to the performance of the method four possible
alternatives were offered: (a) very burdensome, (b) burdensome,
W little burden, or W no burden. Finally, patients were asked
whether they considered to keep BBT records as a part of their
treatment and/or investigation as either: (a) a positive experience,
(b) a negative experience, or W indifferent.
Eighty-one out of the 100 distributed questionaires
were returned. All patients but one had previous experience
with keeping BBTs, and these were included in further analysis.
Mean age of the patients was 31.4 years (SD ± 4) ranging
between 25 and 43 years. Regarding education 3 (4%) had only
completed primary school, 40 (50%) had completed high school,
and 37 (46%) had received higher education. AS related to
the work situation in 2 cases the answers were equivocal,
37 patients (47%) worked more than 20 hours a week, 21 patients
(27%) worked 20 hours or less, and the remaining 20 (26%)
had no active job.
The reason for consulting was infertility in
74 cases (92.5%), other reasons in 3, and not known in another
3 cases. From the total group 69 patients (96%) were currently
keeping a BBT chart or had done so within the last year, whereas
11 (14%) stopped recording more than I year ago. The number
of cycles that patients had kept a BBT chart according to
the indications is given in Fig. 3. In a majority of the cases
(54.5%) the indication was related to the fertility investigation,
in 35 cases (29%) it was used for monitoring of a treatment,
and in 20 cases (16.5%) it was done just as a method of self-observation.
In almost half of the cases BBTs had been kept for more than
6 cycles. Most of the patients (95%) recorded rectal temperature,
2 patients did it vaginally, one axilar and one orally.
Regarding the burden associated with the procedure,
it was qualified as very burdensome by 10 patients (12%),
burdensome by 23 (29%), as a little burden by 35 (44%) and
as no burden by 12 (15%). When asked about their personal
experience with the method, 6 patients (7.5%) expressed it
was for them a negative experience, 37 patients (46%) considered
as positive the experience of keeping the BBTs during their
investigation, and for 37 patients (46%) it was indifferent.
Factors such as age of the patients, education or the category
of infertility did not substantially affect either the degree
of burden associated with the procedure or the way the patients
experienced the method. However, when considering the patients'
occupational situation, it was found that a remarkably higher
proportion (73%) of patients working more than 20 hours a
week had expressed small or no burden associated with the
performance of the method as compared to the groups working
20 hours or less (47.5%) or without an active job (40%), (XI
test: P < 0.05). When associating the burden of the procedure
with the experience of the method (Fig. 4), it was found that
while most patients with a negative experience considered
the method burdensome (5 out of 6), still 10 (30%) of the
patients who regarded the procedure as burdensome expressed
to have a positive experience with the method.
These findings suggest that, despite the intensive
participation required, the use of BBT records is a well accepted
method by a high proportion of our patients population. The
active involvement in the investigation and/or treatment of
their fertility problems as well as the awareness of their
own biological changes are speculative reasons that could
account for this. Whether user acceptability might further
be improved with the advent of novel and more practical measuring
devices still remains to be elucidated.
Applications
Fig. 4. Percentage of patients expressing a negative, indiffer-
ent or positive experience with the method as associated to
the related burden (B + VB: burdensome to very burdensome;
L+NB: little or no burden).
The BBT offers the advantage of being a simple,
cost-effective and reliable method for retrospective timing
and identification of the occurrence of mutation. Its possibilities
and limitations well understood, the BBT may still be used
as a valuable auxilliary too] in the diagnosis and treatment
of infertility problems. The BBT serves Several functions:
(1) gives a rapid and objective impression about the length
of the cycle, possible occurrence of ovulation, and the characteristics
of the menstrual pattern; (2) indicates frequency and timing
of sexual intercourse; (3) provides information for scheduling
of post-coital tests and cervical factor evaluation. By this
means a great proportion of normal cases can be easily evaluated,
while considering the use of more sophisticated techniques
only for cases with doubtful or negative results; (4) evidences
the occurrence of a short luteal phase (< 11 days) and
helps in planning of endometrial biopsies; (5) aids in timing
and interpretation of hormonal determinations; and (6) monitors
the effect of ovulation -inducing agents.
Besides its applications in the diagnosis and
treatment of infertility, BBT records have been extensively
used as an important element of family planning practice.
For this purpose, new sophisticated digital-electronic BBT
recording devices have been developed in an effort to simplify
and improve these measurements [22). Most of them are oral
thermometers that utilize microcomputcr-assisted repeated
calculations giving information on a liquid crystal display
in only a few seconds. These devices document BBT measurements
in a built-in computer program- Algorithms are incorporated
that indicate the fertile and non-fertile phase of the cycle,
whether ovulation has been occurring, and the expected more
fertile phase of the current cycle. Some devices also allow
the possibility of printing out previously recorded readings.
One of the most sophisticated devices available is the Baby
Comp (Valley Electronics, Eschenlohe, Germany), which possesses
an 8-bit micro-processor, with 128 computational registers,
and the possibility to store information of up to 48 cycles
(4 years). It is also programmed to recognize operational
errors. In case of unusually marked temperature variations
or skipped measurements, the device automatically calculates
the missing readings and these will not be used in the evaluation.
By pushing a button information is incorporated on whether
or not the patient is menstruating. The possibility that a
conception has occurred is displayed after 10-18 days, and
calculation of the delivery date is based on the probable
day of conception.
The possibility to modify these devices to process
information related to parameters that can be used by the
clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility would
still further improve the reliability of BBT measurements,
its acceptability by the patients as well as their clinical
applications.
Conclusions
The BBT graph has largely been used as an important adjunct
in the fertility investigation. The main advantages associated
to this method have been its simplicity, noninvasiveness and
low cost. In the last years, with the advent of more sophisticated
methodologies, its value has been questioned and doubts on
its current place have arisen. In the present study the reliability
and applicability of BBT records was reevaluated in. the actual
context of new fertility management techniques.
The method showed a high sensitivity when used
as an index of ovulation. This was in agreement with previous
studies. From our investigation, however, it appears to be
the occurrence of irregular records, here classified as non-interpretable,
the main contribution to erroneous results. Future refinements
in the recording and measurement techniques might further
improve the accuracy of the BBT graph for the detection of
ovulation. The unreliability of BBT records for the prediction
of impending ovulation, as compared to rapid urinary LH surge
detection, was reconfirmed. In addition, it was demonstrated
that it still can provide a reliable guide when used for retrospective
identification of the presumptive day of ovulation.
The way patients experienced daily keeping BBT
records and their reliance on the method has, to our knowledge,
not been previously reported. This pilot study, which was
representative of our patient population, clearly suggests
that the method is well accepted by a majority of the women.
Although 41% found the procedure burdensome, only 7.5% of
the patients reported a negative experience with the method.
These findings indicate that there are many
indications, in the study and management of fertility problems,
where the BBT graph can still be applied. Moreover, it is
to be expected that the development of new electronic devices
allowing the incorporation of relevant fertility data will
further improve the reliability, acceptability and applications
of BBT records in the fertility investigation.
References
1. Squire WS. Puerperal temperatures. Trans Obstet Soc,
(London) 1868;9:129-144.
2. Jacobi MP. The question of rest for
women during men struation, New York: Putnam's Sons, 1877.
3. Van de VeIde TH. Uber den Zusammenhang
zwischen Ovarialfunction, Wellenbewegung und Menstrualblutung
und uber die Enstenhung des sogenannten Mittelschmerzcs. Haarlem,
De Erven F. Bohn, 1904.
4. Van de Velde TH. Die Vollkommene Elie:
Eine Studie uber Are Physiologic und Technik. Leipzig, Sttutgart:
Benno Konegan,1926.
5. Tompkins P. The use of basal temperature
graphs in determining the day of ovulation. JAMA 1944;124-.698704.
6. Marshall J. Thermal changes in the
normal menstrual cycle. Br Med J 1963; 1: 102-107.
7. Moghissi KS. Prediction and detection
of ovulation. Fertil Steril 1980,34:89-98.
8. Corson SL Ovulation prediction in
the treatment of infer tility. I Reprod Med 1986;31:739-741.
9. Jobansson EDB, Larsson-Cohn U, Gernzell
CA. Monophasic basal body temperature in ovulalory menstiual
cycles. Am 3 Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113:993-999.
10. Moghissi KS. Accuracy of basal body
temperature for ovulation detection. Fertil Steril 1976:27:1415-1421.
11. Lenton &0, Weston GA, Cooke ID.
Problems in using has I body temperature recordings in an
infertility clinic. Br Zed J 1987;1:803-807.
12. Bauman JE: Basal body temperature.
Unreliable method of ovulation prediction. Fend Steril 1981;36:729-733.
13. Newill RGD, Katz M. The basal body
temperature chart in artificial insemination by donor pregnancy
cycles. Fertil Steril 19M;38:431-438.
14. McCarthy JJ Jr, Rockette HE. A comparison
of methods to interpret the basal body temperature graph.
Fertil Steril 1983;39:640-646.
15. Ritchie WGM. Ultrasound in the evaluation
of normal and induced ovulation. Fertil Steril 1985;43:167-175.
16. McCarthy JJ Jr., Rockette HE. Prediction
of ovulation with basal body temperature. I Reprod Med 1986;31:742749.
17. World Health Organization Task Force
Investigators. Temporal relationships between ovulation and
defined changes in the concentration of plasma estradiol l7B-lluteinizing
hormone, follicle-stimulating, hormone and progesterone. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138:383-390.
18. Morris NM. Underwood LE, Easterling
W Jr. Temporal relationship between body temperature nadir
and lulcinizing hormone surge in normal women. Fertil Steril
1976 27.780-783.
19. De Mouzon J, Testart J, Lefevre B,
Pouly J-1, Frydman R. Time relationships between basal body
temperature and ovulation or plasm@ progestins. Fertil Steril
1984;41:254259.
20. Quagliarello J, Amy M, Inaccuracy
of basal body temperature charts in predicting urinary luteinizing
hormone surges. Fertil Steril 1986,45:334-337.
21. Martinez AR, Bernardus RE, Kucharska
D, Schoemaker J. Urinary Luteinizing hormone testing and prediction
of ovulation in spontaneous, clomiphene citrate and human
menopausal gonadotropin-stimulated cycles: a clinical evaluation.
Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1991;124:357-363.
22. Albertson BD, Zinaman MJ. Me prediction
of ovulation and monitoring of the fertile period. Adv Contracep
1987;3:263-289.
|